Spend Analysis
Breaking the bill down to what is actually driving it, by service, environment and team — which is usually not where people assume.
Reduce unnecessary cloud expenditure without reducing capability.
Cloud spend grows quietly because nothing forces a review — an instance sized for a launch, an environment nobody switched off, storage retained by default. Nextherrion finds where the money is going, separates waste from necessary cost, and puts in the visibility that keeps it from creeping back once the exercise is over.
Spend analysis, right-sizing, commitment planning and the ongoing visibility that stops the savings eroding.
Breaking the bill down to what is actually driving it, by service, environment and team — which is usually not where people assume.
Matching resources to real usage rather than to the estimate made before anything ran, typically the single largest saving available.
Finding what nothing is using — detached volumes, dormant environments, forgotten snapshots — and retiring it safely.
Using reserved and committed pricing where the baseline genuinely justifies it, without locking in capacity you are about to stop needing.
Moving data to appropriate storage classes and retiring what retention no longer requires, since storage accumulates by default.
The largest savings are usually architectural — the wrong service for the workload costs more than any amount of tuning recovers.
Attributing spend to the teams generating it, which changes behaviour more reliably than any centrally issued policy.
Alerts on anomalies and thresholds, so an unexpected increase is noticed in days rather than at the end of the billing month.
Most cloud waste is not extravagance — it is resources nobody has had a reason to look at since the day they were created.
It varies widely with how long the estate has run unreviewed. Analysis gives a figure grounded in your own usage rather than a headline percentage.
Not if done properly. Changes are staged and monitored, and right-sizing is based on observed peaks rather than averages.
Only against a baseline you are confident will persist. Committing to capacity you are about to architect away is a common and expensive mistake.
Because optimization was a project rather than a practice. Allocation, alerting and a review cadence are what make savings durable.
The teams that generate it, given visibility of what they spend. Central control without attribution tends to produce argument rather than savings.
The first pass is. Keeping it is ongoing, and light — mostly attribution, alerting and a periodic look at what has accumulated.
AI and Generative AI, agent frameworks, cloud platforms, data tooling and modern application stacks — chosen per problem rather than per preference.















Start with a spend analysis. The first pass usually pays for itself.