Source Data Profiling
Establishing what the data actually looks like rather than what the schema claims — where the nulls, duplicates and encoded conventions are.
Move data between systems without losing it, corrupting it or stopping the business.
Data migration is where system replacements quietly fail: the mapping was approximate, the reconciliation was optimistic, and the discrepancy turns up months later. Nextherrion treats it as an engineering exercise with a verifiable result — profile the source, map explicitly, rehearse, reconcile, and keep a route back until the new system has earned trust.
Profiling, mapping, cleansing, rehearsal and reconciliation, with cutover and rollback planned before anything moves.
Establishing what the data actually looks like rather than what the schema claims — where the nulls, duplicates and encoded conventions are.
Explicit field-level mapping including the awkward cases, so the decisions are recorded rather than made silently inside a script.
Fixing what is worth fixing before the move, because migrating bad data faithfully just relocates the problem.
Full dry runs against production-like volumes, which is how the timing, the failures and the surprises are found in advance.
Proving the target matches the source — counts, totals and sampled records — so completeness is demonstrated rather than assumed.
The sequence, the freeze window, the go/no-go criteria and who decides — agreed before the day rather than during it.
A defined route back, kept viable until the new system has run long enough to be trusted.
Deciding what moves, what is archived and what is retired, against retention obligations rather than by moving everything by default.
The difference between a calm migration and a bad one is almost entirely rehearsal. Everything that will go wrong on the day is discoverable beforehand.
The cutover is usually hours; the preparation is weeks. Profiling, mapping and rehearsal are where the time goes, and compressing them is where migrations fail.
Not if reconciliation is done properly. Counts, totals and sampled records are compared so completeness is proven rather than hoped for.
Before, where it is worth cleaning. Migrating bad data faithfully means arriving in the new system with the same problems and a new excuse.
Often not. Retention obligations and actual usage decide it. Moving everything by default makes migrations longer and the target slower.
You use the rollback plan. Keeping a route back viable until the new system has proven itself is part of the design.
Usually with a freeze window, and sometimes with parallel running. Which is feasible depends on the systems and is decided during planning.
AI and Generative AI, agent frameworks, cloud platforms, data tooling and modern application stacks — chosen per problem rather than per preference.















Start with profiling. What the data actually looks like determines everything else.